Web 2 0 E 'just hype

Web 2 0 E 'just hype For the past year or so, there was a lot of talk about this web 2.0. The concept of life, when you come to Dale Dougherty of O'Reilly Media brainstormed with Media Live's Craig Cline. It 's just another term, Web experts and personalities drum supporters and economy? If nothing else, many (resources at the end of this article we skip mention those which were already quoted a hundred times) Agreement on the Web is still maturing, and it changes from "I get" to "come to me" ; says Thomas Vander Wal [1]. The term "hype". This is all that is. Hype. Cry and scream if you want, but the Web can not have a mark like this. This is not a project with a beginning and the timeline. It evolves. When the telephone first came, it did not receive names such as telephone or mobile phone 1.0 BC (before cell). The phone and now the lines are blurring between mobile phones and Inteet connections, including cable TV. But the thoughts and ideas are important. 2.0 poster child for the Web is no longer static and one-way - visitors read the content and play a role. Instead, we see users who participate and connect to each other with services, as opposed to Web - pages. The applications are no longer limited to desktop or the Web site for more than Web-based applications. Websites are becoming more interactive, so users do not just sit and watch the web go. You can do something with the content you see, even if it is not their own, and that happens immediately. Zimbra (Netvibes (Writely (CalendarHub (ObjectGraph Dictionary (Tudu (It is a periodic table of elements (examples are the two-way communication in real time. Go to the site and play with them. It should be easy to understand why these (and some other that no further mention) are the epitome of the Web is. repeat mistakes Topics Most Articles Web 2.0, the following recurring themes are: * semantic markup. * XML. * Portable Content - Content by different pathways involved in places, and links. * Users receive real-time control. * Add metadata, tags, key words, everything. The content is all over the world, thanks to RSS feeds and APIs (Application Program Interface). feeds allow people to a Web - site content or the port of their web sites or mobile devices. Google, Amazon and eBay have developer APIs to allow application of these tools for Web-site. An example is the Google map API to your website that shows how to get to your location. All these are indicators of the major steps forward, we see on the web. They should be grouped and classified. I still do not get it. What is 2.0? Forget web 2.0, but not what it represents. It represents the change, how people in interaction and information on the Inteet. They are the designers and developers think about how people and information that users add value. It presents different approaches to this reality. To be honest, the writing of this article has proved difficult. Read the many definitions of Web 2.0 on the Inteet and say, no two the same thing. It 'still a fashion. Rick Segal writes in his post ", not based on the keywords that give the game or take control." The term is not important. The point is that a change in the Web - the way they have benefited from more real-time control and participation during the connection to each other through many means. Therefore, the ste, with the "brand" and only know the web is growing and a lot of things happening in terms of progress on the interactive experience ' user in the driver's seat. "The term Web 2.0 particularly bugs me. It is not a real concept. It makes no sense. There is a large, vague, nebulous cloud of pure architectural anything," he writes of Joel Spolsky Joel on Software [4]. Vander Wal says: "There is more hype in Web 2.0 as a great step forward." Amen. [1] [2] [3]